|
Flight Paths of planes (last item) 11 September 2002 - The
World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism |
Curiosities
|
||||
| WAG THE WTC I - THE SPLIT SECOND ERROR | WAG
THE WTC II - THE BLOCKBUSTER PART II OF EXPOSING
THE WTC BOMB PLOT by Fintan Dunne, coEditor, PsyOpNews.com Research Kathy McMahon, 4 October 2001 |
||||
Was
the fire hot enough to weaken structural steel?
|
|||||
| 10 Jan 04 - Firefighters' 9/11 Tapes Ordered Released -- Unedited, by Samuel Maull AP |
|
Feds Withhold Crucial WTC Evidence, by Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press 8 Aug 02: The New York Times recently revealed the existence of the tape of radio transmissions between firefighters of the New York Fire Department (NYFD), which proves that at least two men had reached the 78th floor Sky Lobby of the South Tower. The firefighters had reported about the fires and casualties they encountered and begun evacuating the survivors. The article said that firefighters reached the crash zone on the 78th floor, where they went to the aid of grievously injured people trapped in a sprawl of destruction. While the Times article raises as many questions as it answers, it points to a reason for the secrecy: "Once they got there," the article says, "they had a coherent plan for putting out the fires they could see and helping victims who survived." The voices of the firefighters "showed no panic, no sense that events were racing beyond their control," the Times wrote. "At that point, the building would be standing for just a few more minutes, as the fire was weakening the structure on the floors above him. Even so, Chief Palmer could see only two pockets of fire, and called for a pair of engine companies to fight them."... The fact that veteran firefighters had 'a coherent plan for putting out' the 'two pockets of fire' indicates they judged the blazes to be manageable. These reports from the scene of the crash provide crucial evidence debunking the government's unfounded claim that a raging steel-melting inferno led to the tower's collapse... "If FEMA's temperature estimates are correct, the interiors of the towers were furnaces capable of casting aluminum and glazing pottery," Eric Hufschmid, author of the book 'Time for Painful Questions' writes. Yet the voices on the tape prove that several firefighters were able to work 'without fear' for an extended period at the point of the crash, and that the fires they encountered there were neither intense nor large. Incredibly, the South Tower literally disintegrated in less than an hour after being hit by a plane, which impacted between its 78th and 84th floors. "Fire has never caused a steel building to collapse," Hufschmid writes, "so, how did a 56-minute fire bring down a steel building as strong as the South Tower?" Hufschmid's forthcoming book presents compelling evidence that explosives caused the towers to collapse. [we anxiously await its publication] |
NEW SEISMIC DATA REFUTES OFFICIAL EXPLANATION; Two unexplained “spikes” in the seismic record from Sept. 11 indicate huge bursts of energy shook the ground beneath the World Trade Center’s twin towers immediately prior to the collapse, by Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press
The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism
Two or 3 explosions?
There were two or three similar huge explosions, BBC
One Huge Bang...followed by 2 or 3 bangs (20 stories down), BBC
Paths of flights hitting WTC 1 & 2:
First, shouldn't we solve the crime?:
Investigations:
NYPD
- What's their take on this?
whodunnit?
NYFD
- What's their analysis?
Port
Authority of NY & NJ
- any report?
US
Congress
-
“Slow-walked
and stonewalled” By John Prados, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,
March/April 2003, Volume 59, No. 2, pp.
28-37
30 April 2003 - The
Secrets of September 11 [Joint Congressional inquiry secret report],
Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball, Newsweek
18 September 2002 - Congress
Opens Public 9/11 Hearings , by Ken Guggenheim, Washington Post/AP
25 July 2002 - House
vote gives push to independent commission on Sept. 11 attacks
FBI
- Mueller
says: "The hijackers also left no paper trail. In our investigation,
we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either here in the U.S.
or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan
and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot."
An
independent commission?
28 January 2003 -
9/11
Commission Meets, Chooses Director, ABCNews.com
2 August 2002 - 9/11
widows win support for commission, USA Today
a
People's investigation of 9-11?
Evidence:
Foreign Firms Charged With Disposing of WTC Evidence; Why did a foreign company—headed by a knight of the British Empire—manage the controversial “clean-up” of the rubble at the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?, by Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press
What about the passport they found?
| One of the fortuitously available pieces of evidence which the U.S. government used to determine guilt was a passport said to belong to one of the terrorists. This paper document from the cockpit of one of the hijacked jets, "the epicentre of an inferno which vapourised steel, survived the fireball and fell to the ground almost intact." |
Suspects:
9-11 HIJACKER
IDENTITIES STILL UNKNOWN
10 September 2002 - Arab Station Airs bin
Laden Tape, by SALAH NASRAWI, AP/YahooNews [note the face of the speaker
was not shown]
Seven
of the WTC Hijackers found alive!
23 September, 2001 - Hijack
'suspects' alive and well, BBC News
20 September 2001 - Some
Hijackers' Identities Uncertain, by Dan Eggen, George Lardner Jr.
and Susan Schmidt, Washington Post
|
FBI officials said yesterday that some of the 19 terrorists who carried out last week's assault on New York and Washington may have stolen the identities of other people, and their real names may remain unknown. Saudi government officials also said yesterday that they have determined that at least two of the terrorists used the names of living, law-abiding Saudi citizens. Other hijackers may have faked their identities as well, they said. |
The case against the suspected perps:
Then, shouldn't we bring the perpetrators of this domestic crime to justice, rather than just randomly kill a bunch of villagers in a ravaged third world country? see: War On Terror on this site
Could
the World Trade Center buildings have been brought down by intentional
demolition?
It's fantastical to imagine, but what about the
evidence?:
Evidence
of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses
The World Trade Center Collapse: How Strong Is The Evidence For Controlled
Demolition?
as
if a demolition team..., WGN-AM, Chicago Tribune
Were there explosions in the WTC buildings that brought them down?
what are these horizontal plumes of smoke?
Were the WTC buildings brought down by explosions unrelated to the planes crashing into them?
9/11 Terror
- Muslims Suspend Laws of Physics!, by J. McMichael - very detailed
analysis of the fires and structural info on the towers, questions softened
steel collapse theory
|
Using jet fuel to melt steel is an amazing discovery, really. It is also amazing that until now, no one had been able to get it to work, and that proves the terrorists were not stupid people. Ironworkers fool with acetylene torches, bottled oxygen, electric arcs from generators, electric furnaces, and other elaborate tricks, but what did these brilliant terrorists use? Jet fuel, costing maybe 80 cents a gallon on the open market. Let us consider: One plane full of jet fuel hit the north tower at 8:45 a.m., and the fuel fire burned for a while with bright flames and black smoke. We can see pictures of white smoke and flames shooting from the windows. Then by 9:03 a.m. (which time was marked by the second plane's collision with the south tower), the flame was mostly gone and only black smoke continued to pour from the building. To my simple mind, that would indicate that the first fire had died down, but something was still burning inefficiently, leaving soot (carbon) in the smoke. A fire with sooty smoke is either low temperature or starved for oxygen -- or both. |
|
Feds Withhold Crucial WTC Evidence, by Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press 8 Aug 02: On September 1,1 the British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) interviewed one of its New York-based reporters, Steve Evans, who was in the second tower when it was hit. Evans reported: "I was at the base of the 2nd tower, the second tower that was hit. There was an explosion - I didn't think it was an explosion - but the base of the building shook. I felt it shake - then when we were outside, the second explosion happened and then there was a series of explosions. We can only wonder at the kind of damage -- the kind of human damage -- which was caused by those explosions - those series of explosions," he said.... |
Were there explosions at the base of the
WTC towers?
Why did WTC 7 blow up a block away?
What about other possibilities?
Flight Of The Bumble Planes, by Snake Plissken as told to Carol A. Valentine, Curator, Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum
Remote piloting?:
August 2003 - Operation
Pearl, by Professor A.K Dewdney
(a detailed extension of the Valentine-Plissken
Hypothesis)
16 January 2003 - 9-11:
Mitre Corp., Warren Buffet, Global Hawk, and September 11, 2001,
memes.org
October 2001 - "Home
Run" Electronically Hijacking the World Trade Center Attack Aircraft,
by Joe Vialls, PsyOpNews.com
2 October 2001 - Remote
piloting: Solution or disaster-in-the-making?, USA Today
Information specific to each incident:
World Trade Center |
8 August 2002
- Feds
Withhold Crucial WTC Evidence, by Christopher Bollyn, American Free
Press 12 September 2001 - "...On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building...", People.com |
|
Pentagon |
4 June 2002 - DID FLIGHT 77 HIT THE PENTAGON ?; EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS EXAMINED, by Gerard Holmgren, The Power Hour | |
UA Flight 93 |
Seismic Event: The Final Moments of Flight 93, FLIGHT
93'S SMOKING GUN, by Robb Magley
|
Our
own spooks?
